Direct Taxes
- Accountant’s Reports under the Income-tax Act
- Amalgamation and Demergers
- Appeals
- Audit Reports under the Income-Tax Act/ Accountant’s Reports under the Income-tax Act
- Capital Gains
- Capital Gains on Specific Transfers
- Charitable Trusts
- Clubbing Provisions
- Co-operative Society – Taxation
- Deductions and Rebates
- Deemed Dividend
- Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement
- Exempt Capital Gains
- Exempt Income
- Forms of I-Tax Act
- Full value of consideration in respect of transfer of Immovable Property held as business asset – Section 43CA
- Gifts Treated as Income
- Important Due Dates under Direct Taxes
- Income Computation & Disclosure Standard
- Income from House Property
- Interest
- Interpretation of Taxing Statutes
- Investment Planner
- Legal Maxim
- Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT)
- Penalties
- Permanent Account Number (PAN)
- Presumptive Taxation
- Rates of Depreciation
- Rates of Income Tax
- Rectifications
- Return of Income
- Revision
- Salaries
- Search/Survey – Rights and Duties
- Section 14A : Disallowance of Expenditure incurred in relation to income exempt from tax
- Set-off and carry forward of losses
- Settlement Commission
- Statement of Financial Transactions or Reportable Account Annual Information Return (Section 285BA, Rule 114E)
- Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number (TDCAN)
- Taxation of Firms
- TDS Chart
Rectifications
Section |
Subject matter |
Who can rectify |
Time limit |
What can be rectified |
Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
154 |
|
An Income Tax Authority (S. 116) |
4 years from the end of the financial year in which order/intimation was passed |
Any mistake apparent from the record. |
|
254(2) |
Any order passed by ITAT |
ITAT |
4 years from the date of the order. W.e.f. 1-6-2014 six months from the end of the month in which the order was passed |
— do — |
1, 2, & 3 stated above are not applicable. 4 Is same as stated above. 5 Application filed on or after 1-10-1998 shall be accompanied by a fee of ₹ 50. 6 Failure to consider relevant decision of the Apex Court and the jurisdictional HC constitutes mistake apparent, and requires rectification u/s. 254(2). (M/s R J ROLLER FLOUR MILL PVT LTD vs. ITO) (2011-TIOL-208-ITAT-LKW) |